<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Football Kits - The Primary Function</title>
		<description>Comments for Football Kits - The Primary Function at http://www.designfootball.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.designfootball.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:04:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.designfootball.com/278-football-kits-the-primary-function/#comment-1157</link>
			<description>That's a great point and something I neglected to mention.  If I had, however, it probably would have complicated matters even further.  The key point is that if a change is necessary in a two-legged tie then each side should only need to revert to a change kit once whereas, in the case of Hearts and Liverpool, it was &quot;impossible&quot; for Hearts to wear their Home kit in either match. - Jay29ers</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:30:46 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.designfootball.com/278-football-kits-the-primary-function/#comment-1156</link>
			<description>Just a quick note. In Scotland and many other countries it was traditionally the home team that offered the courtesy of changing strips in the event of a clash - it was also true of European club football for many years. That England has a tradition of change strips being labelled 'away' should not be seen as this being the natural state of matters everywhere. - flicktokick</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:13:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
