Gallery
User Panel
My Favourites 
Total pictures in all categories: 9.304
Total number of hits on all pictures: 4487640
Total number of hits on all pictures: 4487640
Stoke City adidas kit Inspired by 1882-1883 Kit
Picture information
Description:
This concept is created for the Potters inspired by the club\'s 1882-1883 kit, the club\'s current kit manufacturer and the club\'s sponsor from 1997 to 2012.
Date:
06.06.2012 09:04:42
Hits:
467
Rating:
No Votes
Author:
Picture Rating
Please login first...
Send to Friend
Please login first...
Total pictures in all categories: 9.304
Total number of hits on all pictures: 4487641
Total number of hits on all pictures: 4487641
Comments for this picture
Nice modern take on the original but I think the badge on the shorts needs to be either just the S as it is on the shirt or it has to be in it's normal red and white stripes. Looks odd being sky blue rather than red.
Apologies for the blatant oversight on the title of the post, rectified it already and hope that this one is still up for consideration.
Thanks Steevo for the thoughts. Just would like to invite comments on the logo on the shorts, as this is currently quite trendy with the kit makers these days (Chelsea new home, leaked Man Utd away etc.)
Apologies for the blatant oversight on the title of the post, rectified it already and hope that this one is still up for consideration.
Thanks Steevo for the thoughts. Just would like to invite comments on the logo on the shorts, as this is currently quite trendy with the kit makers these days (Chelsea new home, leaked Man Utd away etc.)
I think monotone badges can work but for only for certain clubs that have pictorial elements in their badges (ie Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea) but for teams such as Stoke where their badge is based purely on the clubs main colours then it doesn't work.
Thanks Steevo. Your view is noted. But I think the gold monotone AC Milan crest on their recent black 3rd kit looks quite awesome.
I wasn't a fan of the monotone AC Milan badge. Each to their own I suppose.